Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Post 5: Truth in Memoir
In my opinion a book that would be considered non-fiction
should be mostly true. I wouldn't mind if it was embellished to demonstrate a
point as long as it is based off of the truth. All authors try to entertain
their readers by making their stories more dramatic and interesting. Adding
events and details to non-fiction writer’s memoirs is just their way of making
their books more interesting for the readers.
I personally believe that half-truths are okay to put in a
memoir as long as the idea behind it is the same as what really happened. You
know when you pick up a memoir that it will not be a hundred percent accurate. I
am completely okay with Frey and Mortenson bending the truth to make their stories
better. If an author wants to call his
or her book a memoir because the majority of it is the truth and other parts
were embellished why shouldn’t we let them?
It is their book so they should be able to call it whatever they want if
the genres are similar. For example if Nicholas Sparks prefers for his books to
be called love stories instead of romance novels where is the harm? It is the
same basic idea of love and relationships in both genres, the only the people
that the book will most likely appeal to.
I think that Sheilds is right that it really doesn’t matter
what genre a book is classified in, however I believe that genres can help the
reader find similar books that they enjoy and find authors that they like. Genres
should be used to help the reader and not hurt the author by being labeled a certain
way. In my opinion genres aren't really necessary and shouldn't be taken as seriously as they are.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)